Open simulator

DCA vs Lump Sum

Compare investing all at once with spreading the entry over months to reduce anxiety and visualize the cost of waiting.

SIMULATOR

Your numbers

Recalculates instantly as you move the sliders.

ESTIMATED RESULT (LUMP SUM)€77,394
FINAL DCA€72,983
ADVANTAGE€4,410
HORIZON20 years
Lump sum final€77,394
DCA final€72,983

Compare the final capital of each strategy. In this scenario, lump sum wins.

Save my comparison of €77,394. Lump sum wins by €4,410 in this scenario if the market rises steadily.

Save comparison
How to use it

Enter the total amount available, how many monthly installments you would use for DCA, the annual return assumption and the horizon. The tool simulates both paths side by side.

Worked example

With $12,000, investing all at once exposes the full amount immediately. Investing $1,000 per month reaches full exposure after 12 months, so early months compound on less capital.

Common mistakes

DCA reduces timing risk, not asset risk. Waiting indefinitely for the perfect moment can become an unplanned cash position.

Assumptions

Assumptions: same return path for both strategies, no trading fees and no tax effects. Real markets do not move smoothly month by month.

Sources

CNMV — Investor Education · Bank of Spain — Financial Education

Frequently asked questions

DCA vs Lump Sum, with context

Which usually ends higher?

Historically, lump sum often does, because markets tend to rise over long periods and capital compounds earlier.

Does DCA reduce risk?

It reduces entry-timing risk, not the risk of the asset itself.

What return do I use as a scenario?

Use the same assumption for both paths to keep the comparison clean.

What about fees?

If a broker charges per trade, DCA can be more expensive because it uses more transactions.

Illustrative results for educational purposes · Educational information, not financial advice.